To Our Family And Friends Wedding Program

Adopt a book at a distance The next

Christmas is coming and, you know, we are all better people.
so good that like every year we are willing to donate € 10 together with our colleagues to a sponsorship.

It 'nice to see the enthusiasm of those who collect money and membership, as it's nice to see the look of one who is deprived of its 10 note with the deep conviction of having done something good for humanity.
BLEAH!

pity that nobody has the interest to understand the real reason for this inequality. Dare (restituire. ..) 10 € protects eyes and ears from harmful images and words, is a quick gesture, deprives us of much, but gives us much in the eyes of others and of our consciousness.
read a book denouncing already requires more time and more effort. Boycott, try to spread knowledge and Solidarity is the reality, essence, but in society as a note of appearance is 10, but in some cases even less.

from "upside down", E. Galeano:

When she died, Diana presided over eighty public charity organizations. If she was alive, could handle the Ministry of Economy of any government in the southern hemisphere. Why not? After all, charity consoles, but is never called into question: "When I give food to the poor, they call me saint," said the Brazilian bishop Helder Camara. "And when asked why not have food, they call me a communist."
Unlike Solidarity, che è orizzontale e si esercita da pari a pari, la carità si pratica dall’alto verso il basso, umilia chi la riceve e non sposta mai, nemmeno di un millimetro, le relazioni di potere: nel migliore dei casi, un giorno ci sarà giustizia, ma nell’alto dei cieli. Qui sulla terra la carità non perturba l’ingiustizia.
Si propone solo di dissimularla.

Reducing Ovarian Cysts Homeopathically

DDL

Non ho tempo, ma non posso esimermi dal commentare questa notizia.
Ve lo dico prima, è un post totalmente inutile, è solo uno sfogo contro chi tocca una delle cose che amo fare e che rendono la vita piacevole: Mangiare!

Rotondi contro la pausa pranzo
«È un danno per il lavoro»
Il ministro per l'attuazione del programma di governo: «Non mi piace questa ritualità che blocca tutta l'Italia»

MILANO - «La pausa pranzo è un danno per il lavoro, ma anche per l'armonia della giornata. Non mi è mai piaciuta questa ritualità che blocca tutta l'Italia».

MA CE C.... STA DISC???
si chiama alimentazione, non ritualità, e non è neanche forzata!
Siamo al paradosso, ormai si lavora per lavorare di più, non per mangiare.

Ne è convinto il Gianfranco Rotondi, ministro per l'attuazione del programma di governo, intervistato dalla tv web «KlausCondicio», in onda su YouTube.

This is a minister, does the media with very low level of persons who hold positions alas important.

course, he adds, "we can not require workers when to eat, but I discovered that the most productive hours are those in which you are about to have lunch.

Embee ... so we should just go have lunch at work, more or less at about 9 am, as it is naturally less productive time.

any person conducting business on their own, would abolish the lunch break. "

I wonder what time they start working, self-employed ...

But this is not a proposal: "I have not made any proposal to abolish the lunch break, I just said that I have abolished two decades and the same advice to the Chamber of Deputies, because that is the time at which it works better. " The minister then added: "It is clear that workers must have their breaks and have to eat, maybe it would be helpful if everyone was managing this pause as he thinks, but it is clear that it is impossible."

fact, better to abolish it altogether.

RESEARCH - "If anything would be better to distribute it in a different way, as happens in other countries," the minister explained by analyzing data from a study on the topic, which shows that Italy represents an isolated case. Research which shows that "in Germany, for example, to boost productivity in the lunch break lasts half an hour some jobs, but is extended to 45 minutes for those who work beyond 9 hours. However, according to a recent survey, one quarter of Germans spend their working lunch.

But why are workaholic, not in half an hour because you do not have time even to brush your teeth, you're not more evil!

In England many employees will waive or reduce both the number of minutes in breaks during the week. Over the past two years, has fallen from an average of 3.5 breaks per week of 2006 to 3.3 in 2008.

Maybe someone, recently, for fear of losing their jobs and do not eat more considered it appropriate to give up a meal ...

Even less than 3 for women.

produce more, and you're also more fotogienica! who want more from life?
a tranquilizer!

In France recognizes the status of workers 20 minutes every 6 hours, while in America the lunch break is not really required by federal law and is independently regulated by individual states, while in Canada and Sweden have lunch at the desk. "

Luckily work in Italy where they met all my rights!

IN PARLIAMENT - Members of Parliament and the refreshment stands? "We close the refreshment stands. It costs too much and make you fat MPs. " Here again the minister is convinced: "I believe that the refreshment stands should be closed: it costs too much and it would be interesting to see why so serious so heavy on the budget of the House - said Rotondi -. There is talk of 5 million euro.

Mah, but meals cost less than the refreshment stall at the bakery of confidence in the house:
http://www.repubblica.it/2009/03/sezioni/politica/buvette/buvette/buvette.html

Demagogy aside, I think that it is not economic and that it could do without. MPs eat too, and this fat is not healthy.

My colleagues are not fat, in fact I see that maybe someone would need 2 for lunch breaks How long thin and stressed out ...

brunettiana is not an issue, but physical condition, as gains in health. I recommend it to everyone. "

I advice everyone to work as an MP!

"The Chamber of Deputies has a budget so hard that if you close the two refreshment stands, there would be a savings. It is simply not increasing the burden on taxpayers - continues the minister -.

BUAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, fact burden on taxpayers
in place of the meals we could take other vosri billion doses of vaccine-crap.

I have never boarded a plane state, use the little car service, are frugal with public money and I pay attention also to the petty expenses. As the President of the Council even go around switching off lights in offices. I am absolutely in line with the ideas of the Italian saving public money. "

Here it is, but arrived too late. As a good servant to comply with the paradigm of the reference to workers' employer!
pity that her boss prefers the dark for up to shed light on his business ... but that's another story.

Source of this shit: http://www.corriere.it/politica/09_novembre_23/rotondi-pausa-pranzo_495a963e-d829-11de-a7cd-00144f02aabc.shtml?fr=box_primopiano

Best Beer Pong Rerack Names

knock down walls, raise barriers







These are not walls, barriers are only
(1) , (2) .
A wall falling makes a noise, a barrier that stands no.

Post

Loette Contraceptive Pill, Period

The triple vaccine scam

very brief due to lack of time and then go straight to the point

Scam n.1

The vaccine of this he's talked about widely, I have also talked about in previous posts. Mountains of money moved into the coffers of pharmaceutical companies.

Truffa n.2
L'antivirale
E scandaloso che dopo tanto parlare di questo vaccino e dopo i contratti stipulati con le varie Novartis, Glaxo ecc. la consegna e la somministrazione del vaccino vada a RILENTO!!!
Ebbene si, il virus corre più veloce del vaccino! Mi chiedo cosa abbiamo speso a fare tanto denaro se stiamo arrivando velocemente all'esposizione massima al virus. Altro che 4 milioni di vaccini, di questo passo ne serviranno ben pochi perchè finchè arriveranno saremo tutti autoimmuni.

Truffa n.3
La ricorsività
Il terzo ed ultimo step di questa gigantesca truffa è la seguente frase che viene ripetuta da giorni:
"E' una normale influenza"
E in fatti the flu is no longer a simple flu. There is serious danger that those who believed from the beginning of everything that was said, and many (more or less all those who make television their primary source of information), fall into this state of psychosis for any influence in the coming years, recursively feeding the coffers of producers of vaccines and antivirals.

Three, as the God (money?) One and three, as the perfect number, such as fraud
perfect.

What Causes Nausea And Bloating

I do not

- Interviewer - "Can you explain why doctors are reluctant to vaccinate?"
- Ferruccio Fazio (Vice Minister of Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Policy) - "Look, we are in line with other years, there is nothing to worry about. Every year there is a low adherence to the vaccination by the medical staff."
End interview

Basically almost all the doctors refused to administer the vaccine.
Exactly.
And why?

The vaccine distributed in Italy is produced by Novartis, which contains the controversial adjuvant MF95.

This adjuvant is supposed to do the work faster (but harmlessly?), Which reduces the amount per dose of vaccine, but also the number of doses administered to each individual.

In essence, the less will be required for each individual vaccine doses
individual will be more available (no charge for champagne ....)
mass vaccination, thus justifying the use of adjuvants. However

doctors, no doubt more aware of the common people, they know perfectly well that adjuvants have side effects, possibly severe, lead the FDA (Food & Drug Administration) does not authorize its presence in vaccines A H1N1 distributed in the United States.

I tried to search the articles in the Italian papers concerning the issue of adjuvant ... but, as expected, I found only the usual "silent chorus."
Mi sono accontentato di leggere un articolo del NY Times , del quale suggerisco una lettura integrale. Ecco comunque un estratto interessante:

While adjuvants tend to increase the temporary pain, swelling or fatigue caused by a vaccine, the main concern is whether they might cause an autoimmune disease, like rheumatoid arthritis, in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues. Some animal studies have suggested that possibility.

Last year, the F.D.A. halted a clinical trial of a hepatitis B vaccine containing a novel adjuvant after one participant developed a type of blood-vessel inflammation that is considered an autoimmune disease. But the agency lifted its hold this month, apparently satisfied that the vaccine, made by Dynavax Technologies, was not the cause.

Adjuvant makers say there is no cause for concern with the flu vaccines. Dr. Bruce Innis, head of the clinical flu vaccine team at GlaxoSmithKline, said the immune response spurred by his company’s adjuvant was directed only at the antigen in the vaccine. “There is not a general upregulation of immune responses across the body,” which would be needed for an autoimmune disease, Dr. Innis said.

Novartis says more than 40 million doses of vaccine with its adjuvant have been used in Europe, with no signs of problems. But Dr. Fauci, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Novartis’s adjuvant had been used mainly among the elderly, who tended to have weaker immune systems. There is less data, he said, on its use among children, younger adults and pregnant women.



Non v'è dubbio che i grandi colossi farmaceutici, come Novartis e Glaxo, siano perfettamente consci del rischio a cui si stanno sottoponendo.
Ovvero che il rischio di morte da A H1N1 sia molto inferiore al rischio di avere conseguenze più o meno gravi dall'assunzione del vaccino.
D'altronde tali rischi, essendo a lungo termine, lasciano il tempo e le possibilità economiche per trovare delle scappatoie, visto che, con il giro d'affari generato (pensate che si venderanno MILIARDI di dosi), il potere acquisito nel giro di pochi mesi da parte dei suddetti colossi sarà enorme.

Io mi tengo l'influenza, ho così tanti libri da leggere che una settimana a casa non mi spaventa.
Io non mi vaccino.